---
title: Explanation of China's trademark system (guide for Japanese companies)
description: A detailed explanation of China's trademark system for Japanese companies. A guide that covers everything from application procedures to registration...
image: https://www.evorix.jp/hubfs/unnamed%20(52).jpg
---

[Skip to content](https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E3%81%AE%E5%95%86%E6%A8%99%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E8%A7%A3%E8%AA%AC%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E4%BC%81%E6%A5%AD%E5%90%91%E3%81%91%E3%82%AC%E3%82%A4%E3%83%89#main-content)

- [English](https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド)
- [Chinese](https://www.evorix.jp/zh/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド)
- [Deutsch (German)](https://www.evorix.jp/de/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド)
- [Español (Spanish)](https://www.evorix.jp/es/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド)
- [Français (French)](https://www.evorix.jp/fr/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド)
- [Português (Portuguese)](https://www.evorix.jp/pt/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド)
- [한국어 (Korean)](https://www.evorix.jp/ko/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド)
- [日本語 - 日本 (Japanese - Japan)](https://www.evorix.jp/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド)

English

Show submenu for translations

[![知的財産事務所エボリクス/EVORIX/大阪/特許・商標・意匠登](https://www.evorix.jp/hs-fs/hubfs/%E7%9F%A5%E7%9A%84%E8%B2%A1%E7%94%A3%E4%BA%8B%E5%8B%99%E6%89%80%E3%82%A8%E3%83%9C%E3%83%AA%E3%82%AF%E3%82%B9%20(500%20%C3%97%20250%20px).png?width=500&height=250&name=%E7%9F%A5%E7%9A%84%E8%B2%A1%E7%94%A3%E4%BA%8B%E5%8B%99%E6%89%80%E3%82%A8%E3%83%9C%E3%83%AA%E3%82%AF%E3%82%B9%20(500%20%C3%97%20250%20px).png)](https://www.evorix.jp/)

- [Services](https://www.evorix.jp/en/contents)
  
  Show submenu for Services 
  
    - [Patent Filing](https://www.evorix.jp/en/patent-service)
    - [Trademark Registration](https://www.evorix.jp/en/trademark-service)
    - [Design Registration](https://www.evorix.jp/en/design-service)
    - [Copyright](https://www.evorix.jp/en/copyright-service)
    - [Unfair Competition](https://www.evorix.jp/en/unfair-competition)
    - [Patent Attorney Advisor](https://www.evorix.jp/en/komon)
- [International Filing](https://www.evorix.jp/en/international)
  
  Show submenu for International Filing 
  
    - [PCT International Patent](https://www.evorix.jp/en/pct)
    - [Madrid Protocol Trademark](https://www.evorix.jp/en/madrid-protocol-trademark)
    - [Hague Design Application](https://www.evorix.jp/en/hague-design-application)
    - [Global Patent Systems](https://www.evorix.jp/patent-world)
    - [Global Trademark Systems](https://www.evorix.jp/trademark-world)
    - [Global Design Systems](https://www.evorix.jp/design-world)
- [Industries](https://www.evorix.jp/en/industries)
  
  Show submenu for Industries 
  
    - [For Startups](https://www.evorix.jp/en/startup)
    - [For Manufacturing](https://www.evorix.jp/en/manufacturing)
    - [For IT Companies](https://www.evorix.jp/it-ip-portal)
- [About Us](https://www.evorix.jp/en/about)
  
  Show submenu for About Us 
  
    - [Firm Overview](https://www.evorix.jp/en/about)
    - [Philosophy & Vision](https://www.evorix.jp/philosophy)
    - [Our Patent Attorneys](https://www.evorix.jp/en/staff)
    - [Locations](https://www.evorix.jp/en/access)
    - [Seminars & Lectures](https://www.evorix.jp/en/seminar)
    - [Careers](https://www.evorix.jp/en/recruit)
- [Resources](https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog)
  
  Show submenu for Resources 
  
    - [Blog](https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog)
    - [FAQ](https://www.evorix.jp/en/faq)
    - [IP Glossary](https://www.evorix.jp/en/glossary)
    - [Foreign Filing Subsidy Guide](https://www.evorix.jp/%E3%82%B8%E3%82%A7%E3%83%88%E3%83%AD%E5%A4%96%E5%9B%BD%E5%87%BA%E9%A1%98%E5%8A%A9%E6%88%90%E9%87%91%E3%81%AE%E3%81%94%E6%A1%88%E5%86%85)
    - [AI Draft × Patent Attorney Check](https://www.evorix.jp/ai-draft-patent-lp)
- [Contact](https://www.evorix.jp/en/inquiry)
  
  Show submenu for Contact 
  
    - [Consultation Process](https://www.evorix.jp/en/consultation)
    - [Inquiry Form](https://www.evorix.jp/en/inquiry)

Open main navigation

Close main navigation

- [Services](https://www.evorix.jp/en/contents)
  
  Show submenu for Services 
  
    - [Patent Filing](https://www.evorix.jp/en/patent-service)
    - [Trademark Registration](https://www.evorix.jp/en/trademark-service)
    - [Design Registration](https://www.evorix.jp/en/design-service)
    - [Copyright](https://www.evorix.jp/en/copyright-service)
    - [Unfair Competition](https://www.evorix.jp/en/unfair-competition)
    - [Patent Attorney Advisor](https://www.evorix.jp/en/komon)
- [International Filing](https://www.evorix.jp/en/international)
  
  Show submenu for International Filing 
  
    - [PCT International Patent](https://www.evorix.jp/en/pct)
    - [Madrid Protocol Trademark](https://www.evorix.jp/en/madrid-protocol-trademark)
    - [Hague Design Application](https://www.evorix.jp/en/hague-design-application)
    - [Global Patent Systems](https://www.evorix.jp/patent-world)
    - [Global Trademark Systems](https://www.evorix.jp/trademark-world)
    - [Global Design Systems](https://www.evorix.jp/design-world)
- [Industries](https://www.evorix.jp/en/industries)
  
  Show submenu for Industries 
  
    - [For Startups](https://www.evorix.jp/en/startup)
    - [For Manufacturing](https://www.evorix.jp/en/manufacturing)
    - [For IT Companies](https://www.evorix.jp/it-ip-portal)
- [About Us](https://www.evorix.jp/en/about)
  
  Show submenu for About Us 
  
    - [Firm Overview](https://www.evorix.jp/en/about)
    - [Philosophy & Vision](https://www.evorix.jp/philosophy)
    - [Our Patent Attorneys](https://www.evorix.jp/en/staff)
    - [Locations](https://www.evorix.jp/en/access)
    - [Seminars & Lectures](https://www.evorix.jp/en/seminar)
    - [Careers](https://www.evorix.jp/en/recruit)
- [Resources](https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog)
  
  Show submenu for Resources 
  
    - [Blog](https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog)
    - [FAQ](https://www.evorix.jp/en/faq)
    - [IP Glossary](https://www.evorix.jp/en/glossary)
    - [Foreign Filing Subsidy Guide](https://www.evorix.jp/%E3%82%B8%E3%82%A7%E3%83%88%E3%83%AD%E5%A4%96%E5%9B%BD%E5%87%BA%E9%A1%98%E5%8A%A9%E6%88%90%E9%87%91%E3%81%AE%E3%81%94%E6%A1%88%E5%86%85)
    - [AI Draft × Patent Attorney Check](https://www.evorix.jp/ai-draft-patent-lp)
- [Contact](https://www.evorix.jp/en/inquiry)
  
  Show submenu for Contact 
  
    - [Consultation Process](https://www.evorix.jp/en/consultation)
    - [Inquiry Form](https://www.evorix.jp/en/inquiry)
- - [English](https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド)
    - [Chinese](https://www.evorix.jp/zh/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド)
    - [Deutsch (German)](https://www.evorix.jp/de/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド)
    - [Español (Spanish)](https://www.evorix.jp/es/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド)
    - [Français (French)](https://www.evorix.jp/fr/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド)
    - [Português (Portuguese)](https://www.evorix.jp/pt/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド)
    - [한국어 (Korean)](https://www.evorix.jp/ko/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド)
    - [日本語 - 日本 (Japanese - Japan)](https://www.evorix.jp/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド)
  
  
  
  
  English
  
  Show submenu for translations
- [Contact](https://www.evorix.jp/en/inquiry)

[Contact](https://www.evorix.jp/en/inquiry)

 2026/05/23

# Explanation of China's trademark system (guide for Japanese companies)

![Picture of 弁理士 杉浦健文](https://www.evorix.jp/hs-fs/hubfs/top-profile-pic-sugiura-1.jpg?width=50&name=top-profile-pic-sugiura-1.jpg)  弁理士 杉浦健文

Share: [facebook-f icon](http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド) [linkedin-in icon](http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド) [Twitter icon](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド) [pinterest-p icon](http://pinterest.com/pin/create/link/?url=https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド) [envelope icon](mailto:?body=https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド)

![unnamed (52)](https://www.evorix.jp/hs-fs/hubfs/unnamed%20(52).jpg?width=1024&height=572&name=unnamed%20(52).jpg)

A comprehensive explanation of the trademark system in China from the perspective of a Japanese intellectual property person and patent attorney. We will explain the procedure flow from trademark application to registration, registration requirements and classification system, opposition/invalidation system, duration and renewal of rights, non-use cancellation system, system comparison with Japan (mainly Japan), and practical points to note (measures against filing in bad faith, measures to prevent pre-emption, utilization of the Madrid Protocol, consideration of local language trademarks, etc.).

## 1. Flow of trademark registration (from application to registration)

In China, a **first-to-file system (first-to-file system: first-come, first-served) is adopted, and as in Japan, the person who files the application first obtains trademark rights, regardless of whether or not they are using the trademark. Therefore, it is important to**apply early**to avoid being preempted by others. The general flow from application to registration of a Chinese trademark is as follows.** 

**![unnamed (51)](https://www.evorix.jp/hs-fs/hubfs/unnamed%20(51).jpg?width=1024&height=572&name=unnamed%20(51).jpg)

*Flowchart showing the standard procedure flow from Chinese trademark application to registration (application, examination, public notice, registration). Note that the difference with the Japanese system is that registration is not immediate after examination, but there is a **3-month public notice and opposition period**.***

*Supplementary*: In the case of **international trademark registration applications (Madpro applications) based on the Madrid Protocol, the basic process is the same, but the application data is reported from WIPO to the China Trademark Office and examination begins. If China does not notify the refusal within 18 months of the WIPO notification, it will be deemed that protection has been granted (\*Details will be described later).** 

**## 2. Registration requirements and classification system (Nice classification, etc.)

**Registration requirements**: In China, the main requirements for trademark registration are that the trademark be **distinctive** and **not conflict with the existing trademark rights of others. Specifically, signs that can be visually or audibly identified, such as symbols, letters, figures, three-dimensional shapes, color combinations, and sounds, are eligible for registration. With the revision of the law in May 2014,**sound trademarks** can now be registered. On the other hand, **color-only trademarks**, **motion (video) trademarks, holograms**, and **scent (olfactory) trademarks**, which are recognized in Japan, cannot be registered in**China. In addition, three-dimensional trademarks consisting only of the functional shape of the product itself, trademarks that violate public order and morals, commonly used names or descriptive marks, illegal imitations or translations of other people's famous trademarks, those that include the portrait or name of another person without permission, and those related to public symbols such as the national flag or national emblem are also prohibited from being registered (as stipulated in Articles 10 and 11 of the Chinese Trademark Law).**** 

******Trademarks that lack distinctiveness** (for example, only extremely simple topographical figures, only words describing the product, etc.) will generally be rejected. However, if a trademark becomes famous through long-term use and has acquired distinctiveness, registration may be approved by claiming "secondary meaning" (provisions for protection of famous trademarks apply). In addition, trademarks that are identical or similar to another person's well-known or famous trademarks and are filed for fraudulent purposes are subject to rejection or invalidation. For example, trademarks that cause confusion by copying or translating someone else's well-known trademark, or trademarks that include geographical indications that may lead to misidentification of the country of origin, cannot be registered.

**Classification System (Nice Classification)**: China classifies goods and services based on the international Nice Classification (Class 1 to Class 45). With the **2014 revision**, it is now possible to file multiple categories (multi-category application) in one application. Therefore, one application can cover multiple classes of designated goods and services. However, it should be noted that, in principle, **division after filing** is not allowed in China (divisional applications can be filed only in the case of partial rejection).

When filing an application, it is necessary to **specifically describe the designated goods and services**. **Inclusive claims** (e.g. "Category 25 All Clothing" etc.) are not permitted; each item must be listed using its specific name. The China Trademark Office annually publishes the **Similar Goods and Services Classification Table**, which is the Chinese version of the list of eccentric goods and services. It is recommended that you specify the notation in this list whenever possible. Using the terms listed will make the review process smoother and avoid requests for corrections due to incorrect terminology.

In addition, **If the number of designated goods/services is 11 or more**, an additional fee will be charged for each additional item from the 11th item onwards. For example, you can apply for up to 10 products with the basic fee, but from the 11th product onwards, government fees will be added for each item (therefore, you will need to select the items you want to specify depending on the balance with the application cost). In this respect, in Japan, there is a flat fee for each category, but in China, the fee increases based on the number of points.

**Differences in classification with Japan**: Particular attention should be paid to **the same kanji name often has a different connotation range (similarity range) in Japan and China**. For example, in Japan, specifying "Category 25 Clothing" covers all clothing (including hats, etc.), but in China, specifying "Clothing" does not include hats. In China, "clothing" refers to clothing worn on the upper and lower body, and "hats" worn on the head are treated separately, so even if you obtain trademark rights for "clothing", it does not apply to hats. Furthermore, in Japan, "surfactants" and "industrial chemicals" have the same similar group code (01A01) and are considered to be **similar products**, but in China they are considered **dissimilar products**. In other words, if you register only "surfactant" as a trademark in Japan, you can prevent someone else from registering the same trademark for "industrial chemicals," but in China, even if you register "surfactant," that does not stop someone else from registering the same trademark for "industrial chemicals." In fact, in **Chinese court precedents**, there are cases where products that are treated as dissimilar under the examination standards are determined to be similar in litigation, so there are some things that are not straightforward. In this way, the standards and classification code systems for similar products are different in Japan and China. Therefore, when filing an application in China, it is not enough to simply translate and convey the designation of the application in Japan. **It is important to reconsider the classification and designated scope in China with experts based on the products and services actually handled locally**.

**Similar group code**: China also has a "similar group code" for examination (a code for determining whether goods and services are similar or not). In Japan, it is a 5-digit (number + alphabet) similar group code, but in China it is managed using a 3- to 4-digit numeric code. At the screening stage, products with the same similar group code tend to be judged as similar products. However, **Court**s may make judgments without being bound by the Similarity Group Code; for example, products that were determined to be dissimilar in examination may be determined to be similar in court. In practice, we should consider a wide designation that is as risk-free as possible, keeping in mind the discrepancy between examination standards and judicial decisions.

**Other notes**: China does not have a **standard writing system** like Japan. Even when applying for a word trademark, there is no concept of obtaining rights based on a uniform font format, and the font and design submitted are registered exactly as they are. However, in the case of alphabets and kanji, if an application is filed in a non-decorative typeface, the letters themselves will essentially be protected as trademarks. On the other hand, please be aware that if you apply with characters that are not found in China, such as **hiragana or katakana**, the application will be treated as a **graphic trademark (logo)** during examination. For example, if you submit a katakana trademark, it will be recognized as a design rather than a language, so if the fonts are different even though they have the same reading, they may be determined to be different trademarks. Consideration may be given to the local name and other strategies, such as applying for a trademark written in Chinese characters if necessary (\*Chinese trademarks will be discussed later).

## 3. Opposition system and invalidation trial system

China also has an opposition and invalidation system before and after trademark registration. In order to protect your company's trademark, be aware of this as a means to counter inappropriate trademark registrations by others.

### Objection system (objection application)****

****As mentioned above, in China, the application is published** before the trademark is registered (after the preliminary examination), and a third party can file an opposition (filing for opposition) within three months from the date of publication**. This system is called the "pre-grant objection system," and the timing is different from Japan's post-registration objection system. When an opposition is filed, the Trademark Office will examine the claims and evidence of both the petitioner and applicant and decide whether or not to register.

**Subject of opposition (eligibility to file)**: Due to the 2014 amendment to the Trademark Law, certain eligibility requirements have been established for those who can file an opposition. Before the amendment, \`\`any person'' could file an opposition, but after the amendment, only the holder of the prior right or an interested party can file an objection if the applied trademark conflicts with another person's prior rights (relative grounds). This is a measure to prevent unrelated third parties from raising objections for harassment purposes. On the other hand, if the trademark itself has a public interest issue (falling under an absolute ground for refusal), it is understood that anyone can object regardless of their interest (for example, it is said that anyone can object if it violates public order and morals). In practice, most objections are filed by**prior trademark owners**.

**Results and aftermath of opposition**: If the opposition is approved, the trademark application will be**not registered and rejected**. If the opposition is unsuccessful (opposition dismissed), the trademark remains **registered**. In Japan, if a decision on an opposition is dissatisfied, both the opponent and the trademark owner can appeal to the Intellectual Property High Court. On the other hand, in China, if the opponent loses (i.e., the trademark is registered), there is no system to directly appeal the decision itself. Instead, the dispute will continue by filing a request for invalidation trial after registration. In other words, the two-step approach is \*\*objection → invalidation\*\* (on the other hand, if an objection is accepted and the application is refused, the applicant can request an appeal).

The number of appeals has been increasing in recent years. Statistics show that there were 176,000 oppositions in China in 2021 (31.1% increase from the previous year), indicating that competition and disputes in trademark applications are intensifying. This is an order of magnitude higher than the dozens of cancellations per year in Japan (46 cancellations in 2020). This reflects the situation in China where there are many cases of pre-emption of trademarks of others, and many oppositions have been filed against them.

### Invalidation trial system (declaration of invalidity)

An invalidation trial (request for declaration of invalidity) is equivalent to a registration invalidation trial in Japan, and is a procedure for extinguishing trademark rights that have arisen after the decision to register is made. Not only interested parties but also anyone can request invalidation in certain cases. Under Chinese Trademark Law, filing deadlines and requirements vary depending on the reason for invalidation (reason for request).

- **Absolute grounds for invalidity** (defined in Article 44 of the Trademark Law): If the trademark itself was registered in violation of the law (for example, violation of Articles 10 and 11: national flag/national emblem, descriptive name, violation of public order and morals, etc.), **there is no limit on the deadline for filing**. You can apply for invalidation at any time. In addition, if the registration was obtained by **fraudulent or other illegal means** (for example, by submitting false documents), this will also be an absolute ground for invalidation, and invalidation can be claimed without any time limit.
- **Relative grounds for invalidity** (as stipulated in Article 45 of the Trademark Law): If the registration is in conflict with the prior rights of another person (for example, the same or similar trademark was previously registered by another person, or another person's famous trademark was fraudulently registered), an invalidation petition (dispute petition) must be filed **within five years from the registration date** in principle. There is a **disqualification period** after which it is no longer possible to dispute the trademark (even in Japan, there is a provision in which it is no longer possible to request an invalidation trial based on a prior trademark after five years have passed since trademark registration). However, there are exceptions for **trademarks applied and registered in bad faith**. Specifically, if someone else's well-known trademark is registered as a usurpation, the true right holder (famous trademark owner) can request invalidation even after five years have passed. In other words, the application of time limits is excluded for bad faith registrations of well-known trademarks (\*Even as of 2023, it will be difficult to remedy bad faith registrations that are not "famous trademarks," and there is an argument that this point should be further improved.)

Invalidation trials are first filed by filing a petition with the Trademark Office or the Trademark Review and Adjudication Division (formerly the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board). If the parties are dissatisfied with the decision, they can file a suit for cancellation in court (Beijing Intellectual Property Court)**. If the reasons for invalidity are recognized, the trademark registration will be invalidated (cancelled) retroactively to the**first date.

**Comparison with Japan**: Japan also added a provision in the 2015 amendment that allows invalidation claims for trademark registrations made in bad faith even after five years have passed (grounds for invalidation of trademark registrations made for fraudulent purposes). Similarly, China has also made progress in developing its system in recent years. The important thing is**If someone else registers your property first, your rights will become fixed unless you take action within a short period of time (5 years). If 5 years have passed and the other party's trademark has not been used at all, you may consider deleting it using **Cancellation of non-use** described below, but if the other party is actually using it, this will be difficult and you may end up giving up. Therefore, if your brand has been pre-registered by a third party, you need to consider filing an opposition or filing an invalidation trial as soon as possible.** 

**## 4. Trademark protection period and renewal system

The **duration (validity period) of Chinese trademark rights is 10 years** from the date of registration. The past 10 years have been the same as in Japan, and there are also similarities in the**renewal system**. Registered trademarks can be renewed any number of times every 10 years, and there is no upper limit on the number of renewals. As long as you wish to maintain your rights, you can maintain semi-permanent protection by renewing your rights every 10 years.**

****Renewal procedure**: Before the trademark right expires, you must apply for renewal within **12 months before the expiration**. For example, if the expiration date is May 1, 2025, submit a renewal application between May 1, 2024 and April 30, 2025. Even if you inadvertently fail to renew by the deadline, there is a 6-month grace period (extension period) in which you can renew by paying an additional late fee. The grace period will apply**automatically and no separate extension application process is required. However, once the grace period (six months after expiration) has passed, the trademark will become \*\*expired (deregistered)\*\* and cannot be revived. In that case, you will need to apply for a trademark all over again, but there is also the risk that your trademark will be taken over by a third party.

**Cost**: The government fee for trademark renewal in China is **about 500 yuan per category** (equivalent to about 7,500 to 8,000 yen as of 2023). The price was reduced in July 2019, and before that it was about 1,000 yuan, but it is now about half the price. This amount is**very cheap**compared to the renewal fee in Japan (43,600 yen per category). In China, there is no need to pay a registration fee at the time of initial registration (only the application fee), but in Japan, after passing the examination, you need to pay a separate registration fee (17,200 yen for each category, 28,200 yen for 10 years all at once). In terms of total costs, trademark maintenance costs in China can be said to be considerably lower than in Japan.

**Others**: During the renewal procedure, there is no requirement to submit evidence of use in China (Japan also does not have a declaration of use system like the United States). Therefore, even if you are not using a trademark, you can formally maintain your rights by simply applying for renewal. However, if you do not use a trademark, there is a risk that a third party will request a cancellation of non-use (discussed below), so it is not necessarily a good idea to maintain it blindly. In the case of international registrations (Madopro), renewals are done via WIPO. Please note that the record date for international registration is 10 years from the date of international registration (for example, if China is specified based on Japan, it will be 10 years from the date of international registration, not the date of registration in Japan). Even if you renew, the Chinese side will receive an "International Registration Renewal Notification" and perform the renewal process internally, so it will continue in the same way as a domestic application.

## 5. Non-use cancellation system

China has a system to cancel the registration of a registered trademark if it has not been used for a certain period of time. This is equivalent to Japan's "Non-use Cancellation Trial." Specifically, if**anyone has reason to believe that a registered trademark has not been used in**China for three or more consecutive years,**anyone can request the Trademark Office for**cancellation for non-use** (cancellation of registration). In Japan, only an interested party (for example, a business that wants to use the same trademark) can request cancellation of non-use, but in China, even a third party with no relationship with the use can make a request. Therefore, even if you hold a large number of trademarks for defensive purposes, if you do not use them, you run the risk of being attacked by a third party.** 

****Procedural Overview**: Once a non-use cancellation request is filed, the Trademark Office will issue a notice to the trademark owner and require him or her to provide "evidence of use" or **justifiable reasons for non-use** for the trademark within two months from the date of receipt of the notice. Within this period, the rights holder must submit evidence such as product sales records for the past three years, advertising materials, transaction evidence (invoices, shipping slips, etc.), usage status at the licensee, etc. If evidence of use is not**submitted within the**time limit, or if it is**not recognized by the Trademark Office as 'use' or valid reason**, the trademark will be**cancelled**. In principle, the Trademark Office will decide whether or not to cancel within 9 months from the date of the request.

**Procedure after cancellation decision**: A trademark right owner who is dissatisfied with the cancellation decision can file a **Request for reexamination** with the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (currently the relief department within CNIPA) within **15 days from the date of receipt of the notification. Furthermore, if you are dissatisfied with the retrial decision, you can file a lawsuit with the Beijing Intermediate People's Court (Intellectual Property Court) within 30 days and seek a judicial decision. Although there are step-by-step remedies like this, you should basically think that it is difficult to maintain a trademark that has not been used for three years or more.****

******Scope of "use"**: "Use" here is defined under the Trademark Act as "the act of using a trademark to indicate the origin of goods (or services)." The point is that simply using the same character string as the registered trademark does not mean that anything is fine. For example, simply exporting a product from China to**overseas is not considered trademark use in**China. Therefore, if a Japanese company attaches a trademark to a product manufactured in a Chinese factory and exports it to Japan or other countries, there is a risk that the product will be judged as "not sold in the Chinese market = not used in China." Similarly, exhibiting products at exhibitions is not enough; actual sales and transactions are important. Additionally, if the trademark is used in a manner different from the registered trademark (for example, a registered word trademark is actually used as a logo), it may not be considered a use of the registered trademark itself. Although some font differences are allowed, it is dangerous to use them so differently that they are considered separate trademarks.

**Measures against the risk of non-use cancellation**: After acquiring a trademark, it is important to establish a track record of its use in China as soon as possible and accumulate evidence of use. For example, even if there is no sales plan for the category, you can produce small quantities and sell it on an e-commerce site, or find a licensee and have them use it. Additionally, when filing a claim for damages for trademark infringement, if the trademark has not been used in China within the past three years, the defendant will be entitled to a "defense of non-use." In fact, in China, even if a rights holder files a lawsuit for a trademark that is not in use, the other party may argue that the trademark is invalid because it is not used, and the rights cannot be enforced. Therefore, once you have obtained trademark rights, it is important to regularly check the status of use and save the evidence. On the other hand, if another company's registered trademark is unused, it is possible to have it sorted out by taking advantage of this cancellation of non-use. In addition, if you wish to use the trademark in your own company after the trademark has been canceled due to a cancellation request, you must remember to **immediately apply**in your company's name. This is because anyone can reapply for a trademark that has disappeared due to cancellation, so there is a risk that a third party will steal the trademark and reapply.

## 6. System comparison with Japan

Finally, we will summarize the main differences between the Chinese trademark system and the Japanese trademark system. Although the basic framework (first-to-file system, examination before registration, 10-year protection period, etc.) is common, the details of operation and procedures differ. Here are some points that intellectual property managers who are familiar with the Japanese system should be aware of.

- **Handling of examination and notification of refusal**: In Japan, when reasons for refusal are found during examination, a \`\`notification of reasons for refusal'' is first sent, giving **opportunity for written opinions and amendments**. However, in China, if there are reasons for refusal, a \`\`decision of refusal (final refusal)'' may be notified immediately. Although a simple amendment request system has been introduced since 2014, the opportunity to respond at the examination stage is still limited. From the examiner's point of view, if there is a clear precedential conflict or lack of distinctiveness, there are many cases where the application is immediately rejected, and the Japanese attitude of \`\`Let's submit it first and respond if there is a deficiency'' does not work. It is important to carefully conduct **preliminary research** and apply with a high probability of being able to register. The period for filing an appeal after a decision of refusal is very short, at 15 days, so filing applications in China requires **speedy judgment** and **cooperation with local agents**.
- **Partial registration and division**: In Japan, if there is a reason for refusal for even a part of the designated goods or services for which the application has been filed, the entire application will be rejected (unless the applicant makes an amendment to delete the unnecessary part, the entire application will be unregistered). On the other hand, in China, it is possible to **reject only the parts for which there are reasons for refusal and proceed with the registration procedure as is**for the rest. In other words, even if one product out of 10 has a similar conflict, unless the seller takes special action, only that one product will be rejected, and the remaining nine products will proceed to registration assessment and public notice. This is called the**Partial Rejection/Partial Registration** system. With the 2014 revision, it is now possible to **divide the application** only if you receive this partial rejection notice (the rejected parts can be divided and examined independently, and the non-problematic parts can be registered first). In Japan, the divisional application system is freely possible as long as the application is pending, but in China, it is limited to only when a partial rejection occurs. Therefore, the policy for responding to notices of reasons for refusal is different, and in China it can be said that it is easier to adopt a strategy of obtaining rights as soon as possible even if there are no problems.
- **Timing for opposition**: As mentioned above, in China there is a **three-month opposition period** before registration. In contrast, Japan has an opposition system after registration (within two months from publication). In China, if there are no objections, the application will be registered as is, but there is a tendency for registration to take longer due to the waiting period for public notice. In Japan, if the application passes the examination, the registration fee is paid and the establishment is registered immediately, so it takes an average of 8 to 12 months from application to registration, but in China it takes an average of 15 months or more. From a business standpoint, it is important to take into account that it will take time to obtain rights. On the other hand, the handling in the event of an objection is different; in Japan, the process may take a long time, including the trial decision and judgment, but in China, as mentioned above, the system is to expedite the vesting of rights through the process of **registration and then proceeding to invalidation trial**.
- **Registration fee and maintenance fee**: In Japan, rights only arise after the **registration fee (10 years in one lump sum or 5 years x 2 terms) is paid after appraisal. If this is delayed, the rights will not be established. In China, there is no registration fee payment procedure, and if your application passes the examination, you will be automatically registered and issued a certificate (the government fee has already been paid at the time of application). Maintenance renewal fees are also **very cheap** in China (approximately ¥7,000 per category), which is significantly lower than in Japan (¥43,600/category). For this reason, in China, there is a low cost hurdle for**multi-category/wide-ranging applications, and conversely, there are some cases in which patents are carelessly filed and rights are compromised. However, because maintenance costs are low, it is easy for fraudulent applications and large numbers of speculative trademark applications to occur, leading to an increased burden on examiners.****

****As mentioned above, there are differences between the two countries in terms of **examination/objection procedures, procedural costs, and scope of registration**. Overall, in China, it is important to \`\`**respond with a sense of speed**,'' \`\`**acquire broader rights**,'' and \`\`**early defensive measures**.'' On the other hand, it also has advantages such as "low cost" and "partial registration". In the next chapter, we will explain points that should be particularly noted in practice based on these points.

## 7. Points to note in Chinese trademark practice

Finally, we will introduce practical points when acquiring and maintaining trademark rights in China. These are the challenges that Japanese companies tend to face when developing trademarks in China, as well as their countermeasures and considerations.

### Measures against malicious filing/preemption

In China, there are no end to the cases of preemptive applications (preemptive registrations) for other people's brands. There are cases where famous tourist destination names and product names are trademarked by third parties.For example, \`\`Amanohashidate'' (a scenic spot in Kyoto) and \*\*\`\`Muji'' (a famous Japanese brand) were registered as trademarks by a third party in China, causing problems. In addition, there has been a rampant business in China in which brokers apply for foreign brands in bulk that are likely to become popular, seize the rights, and later sell them to authorized brands at high prices. To protect your brand from such malicious trademark filings, you need strategies from both an offensive and defensive standpoint.

- **Early filing (first move wins)**: If there is a possibility of selling your products or services in China, it is a golden rule to**file a trademark application before you go on sale**. It is too late to think about it after it becomes a hit, and there are many cases where someone tries to apply after it becomes popular, but it has already been taken by someone else. As mentioned earlier, China has a first-to-file system, so the best defense is to submit your application as soon as possible. Especially when announcing your entry into the Chinese market or exhibiting your product at an international exhibition, be sure to obtain your trademark information. Even if you cannot apply in time, it is important to take measures such as taking advantage of the Paris Convention's priority rights (within 6 months).
- **Coordination and monitoring with local agents**: Foreign companies and individuals cannot directly apply for trademarks in China, but must go through**a trademark agency (agent) approved by the Chinese government. It is helpful to select a reliable local agent to monitor trademark publications on a regular basis. If you can discover applications for similar trademarks by others early, you can block them by filing an opposition**at the publication stage. Additionally, even if the registration has already been made, countermeasures such as an invalidation trial or a lawsuit under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act can be quickly considered. Make sure you have a smooth communication system with your local agent.
- **Use of legal amendments to apply in bad faith**: The 2019 amendments to the Trademark Law made it clear that **\`\`bad-faith trademark applications that are not intended for use'' will be rejected**. In addition, there are provisions for penalties for unintentional applications and penalties for agents accepting such applications. Based on these, it is now possible to refuse trademarks that are clearly speculative or harassing at the examination stage, or to have them canceled due to violation of Article 4 through opposition or invalidity. For example, cases where a single applicant has filed hundreds of applications are more likely to be excluded by this revised provision. In practice, a tactic is used to gain the approval of the authorities by claiming in a notice of opposition or request for invalidation that the other party is a trademark broker and has filed the application without any intention of use. However, since proof of bad faith requires evidence of the other party's application status and actual business operations, expert support is essential.
- **Defense by contract**: Trouble often arises when Chinese business partners (agents, distributors, production subcontractors, etc.) apply for or register their own trademarks without permission (Article 15 of the Chinese Trademark Law prohibits fraudulent applications by agents or business associates, but in practice this is a clause that often causes disputes). To prevent this, when concluding a contract with a local company, it is important to clearly state ownership of trademarks and other intellectual property rights, and include a clause prohibiting the other party from filing trademark applications. Even if the contracted party files an application first, they may be able to claim invalidation based on this clause. Additionally, when establishing a joint venture company, it is necessary to clearly negotiate the ownership of trademarks and the scope of usage permission, and to formulate a strategy in advance, such as whether the trademark will be acquired in the name of the joint venture company or the name of the head office.

### Use of Madrid Protocol (international trademark application)

In addition to filing directly in China, there are other ways to obtain a trademark in China: **Filing for international registration based on the Madrid Protocol**. Both Japan and China are member countries of this system, and it is possible to designate China via WIPO based on Japanese trademarks. We will summarize the points regarding the use of Madpro.

- **Advantages**: With MadPro applications, you can seek protection in multiple countries at the same time with a single application. The procedure is simpler than requesting each country's representatives individually, and costs can be managed all at once. In particular, if you have **designated more than 10 items**, filing directly in China will incur additional costs, but if you are filing internationally, you can designate**more than 10 items without additional government fees**. In addition, although it may take an average of nearly three years to register a domestic application in China, in the case of MadoPro, protection will automatically occur if there is no notification of refusal within 18 months, so there is a possibility that the registration effect will be obtained sooner as a result (\*However, as described below, there is still a possibility of filing an opposition even after 18 months).
- **Disadvantages/Points to note**: International registration is based on **the content that has been applied for and registered in Japan**, so the designated products in Japan are also applicable to China. As mentioned above, the scope and description of similar products in Japan and China are different, so there is a risk that the designation in Japan alone may lead to lack of protection in China. For example, if Japan only specifies "clothing," there may be a problem where hats are not covered when China is designated. In international applications, the specifications cannot be changed for each country, so in order to make the specifications suitable for China, it is necessary to make some efforts from the time of application on the Japanese side. In some cases, it may be possible to consider a strategy of **trying to file a basic application in Japan and adapting it to Chinese protection. On the other hand, if this is difficult, you should consider **filing a separate direct application for China only**. With international registration applications, there is less flexibility in correcting document deficiencies than with direct applications, and there is a time lag in communicating with Chinese examiners via WIPO.**

**### Consideration of Chinese translation/local language trademark

What Japanese companies tend to overlook when developing their brand in China is the **Chinese brand name**. Although there are cases where the English or Japanese (kana/kanji) brand name is used as is, Chinese consumers and media often refer to it by **Chinese name that is easy to pronounce locally**. If a**company does not have an appropriate Chinese brand name**, a third party may give it a name and spread it around without permission, or it may be registered as a trademark. Below are the key points.**

The above is a comprehensive explanation of China's trademark system. China is a market with a huge number of applications and fierce competition, but if you understand the key points of the system and respond appropriately, you can firmly protect your brand. Please acquire rights early and manage them continuously, and make use of them for your business in China. Collaborate with local experts as necessary and keep an eye on the latest legal reform trends and precedents. !

[![無料相談を予約する](https://hubspot-no-cache-na2-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/cta/default/20920988/interactive-292186656483.png)](https://www.evorix.jp/hs/cta/wi/redirect?encryptedPayload=AVxigLISgImPMwmXSlOrdbRWByBp9N6%2F%2FnQv65CYIZbQu6XJdsOUXeE9jFHOsjdsP3KXkwyIGJGhTKosAURy9Aff3FUdiLAXHoT0brXlgdlv%2Byylbzu1xqqzFxVyu5ChzdEgXVwZ8krlNYq%2BzTPgNIASI028PlRVtR37wX%2BAajuUY6Oz&webInteractiveContentId=292186656483&portalId=20920988)

![Takefumi SUGIURA, Patent Attorney](https://www.evorix.jp/hubfs/HP-%E5%BC%81%E7%90%86%E5%A3%AB%E7%B4%B9%E4%BB%8B-%E3%83%97%E3%83%AD%E3%83%95%E3%82%A3%E3%83%BC%E3%83%AB%E7%94%BB%E5%83%8F.png)

AUTHOR

Takefumi SUGIURA （杉浦 健文）

EVORIX Intellectual Property Law Firm　**Managing Patent Attorney**

Supports clients across IT, manufacturing, startups, fashion, and medical industries, covering patent, trademark, design, and copyright filings through trials and infringement litigation. Specialized in IP strategy for AI, IoT, Web3, and FinTech. Member of the **Japan Patent Attorneys Association (JPAA), Asian Patent Attorneys Association (APAA), and Japan Trademark Association (JTA)**.

[→ Patent Attorney Profile](https://www.evorix.jp/staff) [→ Contact Us](https://www.evorix.jp/inquiry) [→ Consultation Flow](https://www.evorix.jp/consultation)****** 

**## Related posts

[![Indonesian trademark system overview](https://www.evorix.jp/hs-fs/hubfs/blog-thumbnails/face-post-225180183228.png?height=200&name=face-post-225180183228.png)](https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/%E3%82%A4%E3%83%B3%E3%83%89%E3%83%8D%E3%82%B7%E3%82%A2%E3%81%AE%E5%95%86%E6%A8%99%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E6%A6%82%E8%A6%81)

## [Indonesian trademark system overview](https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/%E3%82%A4%E3%83%B3%E3%83%89%E3%83%8D%E3%82%B7%E3%82%A2%E3%81%AE%E5%95%86%E6%A8%99%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E6%A6%82%E8%A6%81)

![Picture of 弁理士 杉浦健文](https://www.evorix.jp/hs-fs/hubfs/top-profile-pic-sugiura-1.jpg?width=50&name=top-profile-pic-sugiura-1.jpg) 弁理士 杉浦健文 

 2026/05/23

[Read more](https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/%E3%82%A4%E3%83%B3%E3%83%89%E3%83%8D%E3%82%B7%E3%82%A2%E3%81%AE%E5%95%86%E6%A8%99%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E6%A6%82%E8%A6%81)

[![](https://www.evorix.jp/hs-fs/hubfs/blog-thumbnails/face-post-229324668644.png?height=200&name=face-post-229324668644.png)](https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/%E3%82%BF%E3%82%A4%E3%81%AE%E5%95%86%E6%A8%99%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E6%A6%82%E8%A6%81)

## [Overview of Thailand's trademark system](https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/%E3%82%BF%E3%82%A4%E3%81%AE%E5%95%86%E6%A8%99%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E6%A6%82%E8%A6%81)

![Picture of 弁理士 杉浦健文](https://www.evorix.jp/hs-fs/hubfs/top-profile-pic-sugiura-1.jpg?width=50&name=top-profile-pic-sugiura-1.jpg) 弁理士 杉浦健文 

 2026/05/23

Application procedure (flow from application to registration) Thailand's trademark system employs a...

[Read more](https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/%E3%82%BF%E3%82%A4%E3%81%AE%E5%95%86%E6%A8%99%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E6%A6%82%E8%A6%81)

[![Overview of Turkish trademark system](https://www.evorix.jp/hs-fs/hubfs/blog-thumbnails/face-post-225329512170.png?height=200&name=face-post-225329512170.png)](https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/%E3%83%88%E3%83%AB%E3%82%B3%E3%81%AE%E5%95%86%E6%A8%99%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E6%A6%82%E8%A6%81)

## [Overview of Turkish trademark system](https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/%E3%83%88%E3%83%AB%E3%82%B3%E3%81%AE%E5%95%86%E6%A8%99%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E6%A6%82%E8%A6%81)

![Picture of 弁理士 杉浦健文](https://www.evorix.jp/hs-fs/hubfs/top-profile-pic-sugiura-1.jpg?width=50&name=top-profile-pic-sugiura-1.jpg) 弁理士 杉浦健文 

 2026/05/23

We will summarize key points regarding the Turkish trademark system from application to...

[Read more](https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/%E3%83%88%E3%83%AB%E3%82%B3%E3%81%AE%E5%95%86%E6%A8%99%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E6%A6%82%E8%A6%81)** 

**---

[![知的財産事務所エボリクス/EVORIX/大阪/特許・商標・意匠登](https://www.evorix.jp/hs-fs/hubfs/%E7%9F%A5%E7%9A%84%E8%B2%A1%E7%94%A3%E4%BA%8B%E5%8B%99%E6%89%80%E3%82%A8%E3%83%9C%E3%83%AA%E3%82%AF%E3%82%B9%20(500%20%C3%97%20250%20px).png?width=500&height=250&name=%E7%9F%A5%E7%9A%84%E8%B2%A1%E7%94%A3%E4%BA%8B%E5%8B%99%E6%89%80%E3%82%A8%E3%83%9C%E3%83%AA%E3%82%AF%E3%82%B9%20(500%20%C3%97%20250%20px).png "知的財産事務所エボリクス/EVORIX/大阪/特許・商標・意匠登")](https://www.evorix.jp)

Intellectual Property Law Firm EVORIX

 

4th Floor, Qus-Hiranomachi Building,  
3-1-2 Hiranomachi, Chuo-Ku, Osaka-shi,  
Osaka 541-0046 Japan

Mail: [contact@evorix.jp](mailto:contact@evorix.jp)

TEL: +81-6-7777-1884

- [Hague International Design Application](https://www.evorix.jp/hague-design-application)
- [Madrid Protocol International Trademark Application](https://www.evorix.jp/madrid-protocol-trademark)
- [Amazon IP Infringement Support](https://www.evorix.jp/amazon-infringement)

- [About Us](https://www.evorix.jp/about)
- [Our Attorneys](https://www.evorix.jp/staff)
- [Services](https://www.evorix.jp/contents)
- [Consultation Process](https://www.evorix.jp/consultation)
- [Blog](https://www.evorix.jp/blog)
- [Careers](https://www.evorix.jp/recruit)
- [Trademark Portfolio](https://www.evorix.jp/trademark-list)
- [Privacy Policy](https://www.evorix.jp/hubfs/%E8%B3%87%E6%96%99/HP-%E3%83%97%E3%83%A9%E3%82%A4%E3%83%90%E3%82%B7%E3%83%BC%E3%83%9D%E3%83%AA%E3%82%B7%E3%83%BC.pdf)
- [Contact](https://www.evorix.jp/inquiry)

---

 

Copyright © 2026, Intellectual Property Law Firm EVORIX® All rights reserved. **

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "BlogPosting",
  "author" : {
    "@type" : "Person",
    "name" : "弁理士 杉浦健文",
    "url" : "https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/author/takefumi-sugiura"
  },
  "dateModified" : "2026-05-23T07:03:25.664Z",
  "datePublished" : "2026-05-23T07:03:25.000Z",
  "headline" : "Explanation of China's trademark system (guide for Japanese companies)",
  "image" : [ "https://www.evorix.jp/hubfs/unnamed%20(52).jpg" ],
  "mainEntityOfPage" : {
    "@id" : "https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド",
    "@type" : "WebPage"
  },
  "publisher" : {
    "@type" : "Organization",
    "logo" : {
      "@type" : "ImageObject",
      "url" : "https://www.evorix.jp/hubfs/%E7%9F%A5%E7%9A%84%E8%B2%A1%E7%94%A3%E4%BA%8B%E5%8B%99%E6%89%80%E3%82%A8%E3%83%9C%E3%83%AA%E3%82%AF%E3%82%B9%20(500%20%C3%97%20250%20px).png"
    },
    "name" : "知的財産事務所エボリクス"
  }
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@id" : "https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド#article",
  "@type" : "BlogPosting",
  "author" : {
    "@id" : "https://www.evorix.jp/staff#person",
    "@type" : "Person",
    "alternateName" : "SUGIURA Takefumi",
    "image" : "https://www.evorix.jp/hubfs/HP-%E5%BC%81%E7%90%86%E5%A3%AB%E7%B4%B9%E4%BB%8B-%E3%83%97%E3%83%AD%E3%83%95%E3%82%A3%E3%83%BC%E3%83%AB%E7%94%BB%E5%83%8F.png",
    "jobTitle" : "代表弁理士",
    "memberOf" : [ {
      "@type" : "Organization",
      "name" : "日本弁理士会（JPAA）"
    }, {
      "@type" : "Organization",
      "name" : "アジア弁理士協会（APAA）"
    }, {
      "@type" : "Organization",
      "name" : "日本商標協会（JTA）"
    } ],
    "name" : "杉浦健文",
    "url" : "https://www.evorix.jp/staff",
    "worksFor" : {
      "@id" : "https://www.evorix.jp/#organization"
    }
  },
  "dateModified" : "2026-04-16T01:09:15.274Z",
  "datePublished" : "2026-04-11T15:51:24Z",
  "description" : "A detailed explanation of China's trademark system for Japanese companies. A guide that covers everything from application procedures to registration requirements, opposi",
  "headline" : "Explanation of China's trademark system (guide for Japanese companies)",
  "image" : "https://20920988.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na2.net/hubfs/20920988/unnamed%20%2852%29.jpg",
  "inLanguage" : "en",
  "mainEntityOfPage" : {
    "@id" : "https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド",
    "@type" : "WebPage"
  },
  "publisher" : {
    "@id" : "https://www.evorix.jp/#organization",
    "@type" : "Organization",
    "logo" : {
      "@type" : "ImageObject",
      "url" : "https://www.evorix.jp/hubfs/evorix-logo.png"
    },
    "name" : "知的財産事務所エボリクス（EVORIX）"
  }
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "BreadcrumbList",
  "itemListElement" : [ {
    "@type" : "ListItem",
    "item" : "https://www.evorix.jp/en",
    "name" : "Home",
    "position" : 1
  }, {
    "@type" : "ListItem",
    "item" : "https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog",
    "name" : "Blog",
    "position" : 2
  }, {
    "@type" : "ListItem",
    "item" : "https://www.evorix.jp/en/blog/blog/中国の商標制度解説日本企業向けガイド",
    "name" : "Explanation of China's trademark system (guide for Japanese companies)",
    "position" : 3
  } ]
}
```