.png?width=500&height=250&name=%E7%9F%A5%E7%9A%84%E8%B2%A1%E7%94%A3%E4%BA%8B%E5%8B%99%E6%89%80%E3%82%A8%E3%83%9C%E3%83%AA%E3%82%AF%E3%82%B9%20(500%20%C3%97%20250%20px).png)
📌 For those reading this article: If you are considering IT patents for software, SaaS, IoT, etc.,...
1. Introduction - Intellectual property risks hidden in the supply of products to mass retailers and wholesalers
"We finally heard from a major mass retailer" "We were selected by a buyer in a national chain" - For manufacturers and suppliers, supplying products to mass retailers and wholesale channels is a major turning point for business expansion. The scale of sales will suddenly increase by an order of magnitude, and brand recognition will increase dramatically.
However, behind the glamorous stage, there are serious risks regarding intellectual property lurking. If your product infringes on another company's patent rights, design rights, or trademarks, your business with mass retailers could collapse in an instant, leading to the worst-case scenario of huge damages or the removal of your products from all stores.
In fact, many small and medium-sized manufacturers have had their business with mass retailers permanently suspended due to intellectual property troubles, putting the survival of their businesses in jeopardy. In a world where major mass retailers are stricter about intellectual property compliance, it is no longer possible to just say ``I didn't know''.
In this article, for manufacturers and suppliers who are considering supplying products to mass retailers and wholesale channels, we will provide a thorough explanation of the specific details of the intellectual property investigation (clearance investigation) that should be conducted before delivery and the effectiveness of a patent attorney's appraisal in convincing buyers. Please use this as a practical guide to eliminate intellectual property risks in advance and expand transactions with peace of mind.
Table of Contents
- Introduction - Intellectual property risks hidden in supplying products to mass retailers and wholesalers
- Why do mass retailers strictly require intellectual property investigations and proof of non-infringement?
- Three serious penalties when IP trouble occurs
- Contents of intellectual property investigation (clearance investigation) to be conducted before delivery
- Effectiveness of a patent attorney's appraisal report to convince mass retailer buyers
- Advantages of hiring a patent attorney
- Common mistakes
- Summary--Solidify your mass retailer transactions with intellectual property research and appraisals
2. Why do mass retailers strictly require intellectual property investigations and proof of non-infringement?
There are clear reasons why mass retailers strictly require their business partners to conduct intellectual property investigations and prove non-infringement. This is not just a formal request, but a serious issue that is directly connected to the survival of mass retailers' businesses.
2-1. Thorough compliance management
Major mass retailers are often listed companies, and they place compliance management at the core of their management. If a purchased product infringes on another company's intellectual property rights, the mass retailer itself is at risk of being held legally responsible as a seller of infringing goods.
Under patent law and trademark law, the act of selling infringing products ``in the course of business'' is itself considered an act of infringement. In other words, mass retailers cannot use the excuse of ``just purchasing from the manufacturer.'' That is why we try to thoroughly eliminate intellectual property risks at the purchasing stage.
Point:Mass retailers are legally liable even if they sell infringing products that they have purchased. That is why the compliance department is deeply involved in purchasing inspections. Failure to conduct an intellectual property investigation is a major cause of failure at the transaction screening stage.
2-2. Non-infringement warranty clause in the contract
Basic contracts for transactions with mass retailers almost always include a Non-infringement warranty clause. This is a clause in which suppliers guarantee that their products do not infringe on the intellectual property rights of third parties.
Major risks hidden in contract terms
If the non-infringement warranty clause is breached, the supplier isobligated to compensate the mass retailer for all damages. This includes product recovery costs, removal work costs at stores, procurement costs for substitute products, lost profits, and even legal costs if a mass retailer is sued by a rights holder. This clause can become a "ticking time bomb" if an IP review is not completed before signing the contract.
Signing a contract is the same as a legal promise that "all intellectual property risks will be borne by the supplier." That is why it is essential to conduct an intellectual property investigation before signing a contract.
2-3. Reputation risk in the SNS era
In the modern business environment, intellectual property problems are not only a legal risk but also a reputation risk. With the development of SNS and Internet media, news of intellectual property infringement spreads instantly.
Beware of the risk of SNS flameout
``Counterfeit products are being sold at that mass retailer'' and ``This is a major chain that openly sells counterfeit products'' - once such SNS posts are spread, the brand image of the mass retailer will be severely damaged. Mass retailers require suppliers to conduct strict intellectual property investigations in order to protect the credibility of their brands. It should be considered virtually impossible to resume business with the supplier that caused the fire.
3. Three severe penalties when IP trouble occurs
If a product is delivered to a mass retailer without conducting an intellectual property investigation, and it is later discovered that the product is infringing on another company's intellectual property rights, the penalties faced by the supplier are unimaginably severe. The following three penalties are all serious blows that threaten the survival of a company.
3-1. Removal/collection of all stores
Penalty 1: Immediate removal and product recall from all stores
The moment an intellectual property infringement is discovered, the mass retailer will immediately remove the affected product from all stores nationwide. Hundreds, and in some cases, thousands of stores will be collecting the items all at once. Logistics costs for collection, labor costs for store staff, and disposal costs—all of these must be borne by the supplier. For mass retailers operating nationwide, it is not uncommon for collection costs alone to reach tens of millions of yen. Furthermore, since the collected products cannot be sold, the entire purchasing cost will be lost.
3-2. Huge damages
Penalty 2: Huge damage claim
In addition to the claim for damages from the right holder, the mass retailer will also seek compensation for damages based on the violation of the non-infringement guarantee clause. This means that you will have to bear the ``double liability'' of compensating the rights holder and compensating the mass retailer. Compensation to mass retailers includes a wide variety of items, including product recall costs, loss of sales floor opportunities, emergency procurement costs for substitute products, and compensation for damage to brand image. For small and medium-sized manufacturers, a single intellectual property problem can cost an amount of money that can directly lead to business bankruptcy.
3-3. Suspension of trading/freezing of account
Penalty 3: Trading suspension and account freezing
Business with any supplier that causes an intellectual property dispute will be immediately and completely terminate. Generally, transactions are frozen not only for the relevant product but also for all other products. Furthermore, the sharing of information within the industry by major mass retailers can lead to a situation of ``blacklisting,'' where even other mass retailers in the same industry avoid doing business with you. Once lost, it is extremely difficult to restore a trading account with a mass retailer, and it means losing the main sales channel for your business overnight.
The table below provides an overview of the three penalties.
| Penalty | Content | Assumed scale of damage |
|---|---|---|
| All stores removed/recovery | Immediate collection and disposal from stores nationwide | More than tens of millions of yen (disposal costs, disposal costs, purchase costs) |
| Huge damages | Double compensation to right holder + mass retailer | tens of millions to hundreds of millions of yen (fatal for small and medium-sized businesses) |
| Transaction suspension/account freezing | Suspension of trading of all products, blacklisting within the industry | Loss of main sales channel (business survival risk) |
These penalties are not exaggerated. There are actual cases where companies were forced into bankruptcy due to neglecting intellectual property investigations. That's why intellectual property research before delivery is not "insurance" but a "required process."
4. Contents of intellectual property investigation (clearance investigation) to be conducted before delivery
The intellectual property investigation that should be conducted before delivery to mass retailers is called a "clearance investigation" or "FTO (Freedom to Operate) investigation". This is a survey to confirm that our products do not infringe on the intellectual property rights of other companies, and to ensure that we can manufacture and sell them freely. We mainly investigate the following three intellectual property rights.
4-1. Search for patent rights and utility model rights
Patent/utility model clearance investigation
Survey target: Rights related to technical aspects such as product structure, features, manufacturing methods, and material combinations.
Investigation process:First, we clarify the technical characteristics of our products and identify the related patent classifications (IPC, FI, F-term). Next, we comprehensively search for related patents using databases such as J-PlatPat (patent information platform) and compare the extracted patent claims (scope of claims) with our own products in detail.
Special points to note:Patent claim interpretation requires professional judgment. Even if the wording appears different, it may be determined to be an infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. In addition, infringement issues do not arise for patents that have expired or expired due to non-payment of patent fees. Confirming the validity of rights is also an important investigation item.
4-2. Search for design rights
Design right clearance investigation
Survey target: Rights regarding the design (appearance) of the product. Shape, pattern, color, and even package design and screen design (GUI) are subject to protection of design rights.
Investigation process:We organize the design features of our products and search for related registered designs based on design classification (Locarno classification, Japanese design classification). Visually compare the extracted designs and the designs of your own products to determine their similarities.
Points to note in particular: Judging the similarity of designs is based on the "visual impression of the consumer," so even if the details are different, if the overall impression is similar, it may be determined to be an infringement. In addition, with the 2020 revision of the Design Law, the scope of protection has expanded to include partial designs, related designs, and designs for buildings and interiors, so it is necessary to check the latest registration status.
4-3. Trademark rights investigation
Trademark clearance investigation
Survey target:Rights related to signs indicating the origin of the product, such as product names, brand logos, characters, figures, and symbols used on packages, as well as catch phrases and slogans.
Investigation process:Identify the product name and logo used for your company's products, and search for the same or similar prior trademarks using J-PlatPat, etc. When determining the similarity of trademarks, we make a comprehensive judgment based on three factors: appearance (appearance), pronunciation (pronunciation), and idea (meaning).
Special points to note:Since trademark rights arise for each designated product or service, the same trademark may not be a problem if the product categories are different. Conversely, even if the product name is different, if the names are the same, it may be considered an infringement. Additionally, if the trademark is similar to a well-known brand's trademark, it may be regulated by the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, even if the product field is different.
The table below provides a comparison of three intellectual property rights clearance studies.
| Type of intellectual property | Survey target | Eligible product examples | Main risks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patent rights/utility model rights | Structure/function/manufacturing method | Home appliances, daily necessities, tools, food processing equipment, etc. | Determination of infringement based on the doctrine of equivalents, expertise in claim interpretation |
| Design rights | Exterior design package | Furniture, miscellaneous goods, packaging, cosmetic containers, etc. | Similarity judgment based on consumer's visual impression |
| Trademark rights | Product name/logo/slogan | All products (products with a brand name or logo) | Similar names, combined risk with unfair competition prevention law |
5. The effect of a patent attorney's appraisal report on convincing mass retailer buyers
It will be difficult to provide sufficient peace of mind to buyers at mass retailers just by compiling the results of intellectual property investigations in-house. This is where an expert opinion written by a patent attorney comes into play.
5-1. What is a patent attorney's opinion report
What is a patent attorney's appraisal report
A patent attorney's opinion is an official document in which a patent attorney who is an intellectual property expert conducts a legal and technical analysis from a professional standpoint and concludes whether or not the product in question infringes on a specific intellectual property right. It is not just an "opinion", but a logical analysis and conclusion based on the provisions of patent law, design law, trademark law, precedents, examination standards, etc. Patent attorneys are nationally qualified persons, and their expert opinions have high reliability and evidence.
5-2. Providing "peace of mind" to buyers
Buyers at mass retailers are always concerned about the risks of the products they purchase. Even if the product is a best seller, we will not purchase it if there is an intellectual property risk. By presenting a patent attorney's appraisal, you can provide buyers with a strong sense of security that ``this product has been approved by an expert.''
Buyer psychology:Buyers must explain ``why they are purchasing this product'' during the internal approval process. If you have an expert opinion written by an intellectual property specialist, you can pass the internal examination smoothly with the line ``A non-infringement opinion has been obtained from an intellectual property expert.'' This is a great benefit for individual buyers as well. A certificate of authenticity becomes a "weapon" that supports buyers' decision-making.
5-3. Serves as a shield to deny "intentional/negligent" in case of an emergency
Another important effect of a certificate is its risk reduction effect in the event that infringement is later determined.
The certificate acts as a "shield"
A claim for damages for infringement of intellectual property rights requires that the infringer acted intentionally or negligently. If a product was sold based on a patent attorney's appraisal, even if the product is ultimately determined to be an infringement, you can claim that you acted in reliance on the expert's appraisal, which is a strong basis for denying intentionality or negligence. This increases the possibility of reducing the amount of damages and avoiding "intentional infringement" that is judged to be highly malicious (subject to punitive increases in damages). An appraisal is both an offensive sales tool and a defensive legal defense.
6. Benefits of hiring a patent attorney
By requesting a patent attorney to conduct an intellectual property investigation and prepare an expert opinion, you can obtain significant benefits that would not be available if you handled the matter on your own.
6-1. Preventing omissions in investigation
Advantage 1: Comprehensive investigation by professionals to prevent omissions
Intellectual property research requires highly specialized knowledge and experience, such as selecting search keywords, identifying patent classifications, and determining similarities. If you simply conduct a simple search on your own, you run the risk of overlooking important prior rights. Patent attorneys have unique know-how based on extensive research experience, and are able to comprehensively identify latent rights that could not be discovered by your company. In particular, the ability to discover design rights that are easy to overlook, such as related patents classified in different technical fields, partial designs, and related designs, is a strength that only experts can have.
6-2. Proposal for avoidance design
Advantage 2: Proposal for avoidance design when infringement risk is found
If an investigation reveals a risk of infringing on another company's intellectual property rights, a patent attorney will not simply report that there is a risk of infringement. We will suggest specific workarounds such as How to change the product design or design to avoid infringement. In the case of patents, we will analyze the constituent elements of the claim and advise you on which elements should be changed to remove it from the scope of the patent. If it is a design, we will show you points to change in shape to avoid being judged as similar. This makes it possible to eliminate intellectual property risks and deliver products to mass retailers without significantly changing the basic concept of the product.
7. Common mistakes
In the actual field, there are many cases where serious consequences were caused by neglecting to conduct an intellectual property investigation or proceeding with delivery after an insufficient investigation. Here we introduce two typical failure patterns.
7-1. Failure example 1: Case where you were relieved by "just searching online"
Failure example 1: Pitfalls of simple search
Before delivering newly developed kitchenware to a major home improvement center, Company A, a manufacturer of daily necessities, searched for similar products on the Internet and decided that it would be okay since no similar products could be found, so they started delivering the products. However, six months after delivery, a competing manufacturer pointed out that the product was infringing on utility model rights. Company A's product was within the technical scope of a utility model held by a competitor. The reason for this was that the internet search only confirmed the appearance of the product and did not investigate the patent/utility model rights (claims). As a result, Company A was required to recall products from all stores and pay compensation for damages, resulting in a loss of tens of millions of yen.
7-2. Failure case 2: Tragedy of brand name change due to lack of trademark research
Failure example 2: Reprinting the package and loss of trust
Food manufacturer B was commissioned to manufacture PB (private brand) products for a mass retailer, and decided on a new brand name after consulting with the mass retailer. However, without conducting a trademark search, a large number of packages were printed and deliveries began. Later, it was discovered that the trademark was similar to another company's trademark that had been previously registered in the same food field. Mass retailers immediately demanded a change in the brand name, and all tens of thousands of printed packages were thrown away. In addition to the cost of redesigning and reprinting with the new brand name, Company B will also be responsible for the cost of replacing the product at the store. The biggest loss was not only financial, but also the huge loss of trust from mass retailers. Since then, whenever Company B has proposed a new product, they have been cautious, fearing that the same problem will occur again, and have continued to miss opportunities to expand business.
What these cases have in common is that ``a full-scale IP investigation by experts was not conducted.'' If you had consulted a patent attorney in advance, you could have avoided any of these problems.
8. Summary--Solid mass retailer transactions with intellectual property research and appraisals
Supplying products to mass retailers and wholesale channels is a great opportunity for business growth. However, in order to secure this opportunity, it is essential to eliminate intellectual property risks in advance.
I will summarize the important points mentioned in this article.
- From the perspective of compliance management, mass retailers strictly require suppliers to conduct intellectual property investigations and prove non-infringement
- If an intellectual property problem occurs, you will face three severe penalties: Removal of all stores, huge damages, and suspension of transactions
- It is essential to conduct a comprehensive clearance search for patent rights, design rights, and trademark rights before delivery
- A patent attorney's appraisal is extremely effective in providing peace of mind to buyers and as a means of legal defense in case of emergency
- By requesting an expert, you will have the advantage of preventing omissions in the investigation and proposing a workaround design
Intellectual property research and obtaining an appraisal is anecessary expense and the most cost-effective investment in a mass retail transaction. For an investigation cost of several hundred thousand yen, you can avoid the risk of damage ranging from tens of millions of yen to hundreds of millions of yen.
Would you like to ensure that intellectual property risks are eliminated before delivery to mass retailers?
Intellectual property firm EVORIX provides one-stop intellectual property support necessary for mass retailer transactions, from patent, design, and trademark clearance investigations to the creation of expert opinions by patent attorneys. Please feel free to contact us first.
Intellectual property investigation Clearance investigation Mass retailer Wholesale Patent attorney opinion report Patent rights Design rights Trademark rights Non-infringement guarantee FTO survey
AUTHOR
Takefumi SUGIURA （杉浦 健文）
EVORIX Intellectual Property Law Firm Managing Patent Attorney
Supports clients across IT, manufacturing, startups, fashion, and medical industries, covering patent, trademark, design, and copyright filings through trials and infringement litigation. Specialized in IP strategy for AI, IoT, Web3, and FinTech. Member of the Japan Patent Attorneys Association (JPAA), Asian Patent Attorneys Association (APAA), and Japan Trademark Association (JTA).
.jpg?height=200&name=unnamed%20(17).jpg)