Article 4(1)(11) of the Japan Trademark Act — refusal based on similarity to a prior registered...
Cost Estimate: Japan Trademark Office Action Response (2026 Update)

Foreign counsel typically need to provide their clients with a cost estimate before engaging Japanese local counsel. This article presents EVORIX's 2026 fee ranges for JPO trademark Office Action and Provisional Refusal responses, broken down by case complexity. All fees are in JPY and exclusive of consumption tax (10%) unless otherwise stated.
Table of Contents
1. Initial Assessment — No Charge
EVORIX provides a free initial assessment within 3-5 business days of receiving the Provisional Refusal. The assessment includes:
- Substantive analysis of each cited ground
- Recommended response strategy
- Success-probability commentary
- Fixed-fee quote for the response itself
- JPO official fee estimate (translated to JPY at current rate)
No engagement letter or POA required for the assessment.
2. Professional Fee Ranges by Complexity
| Service | Fee Range (JPY) |
|---|---|
| Argument only — single ground, no evidence | 80,000 – 120,000 |
| Argument + Amendment (specification restriction) | 100,000 – 150,000 |
| Argument with Evidence (acquired distinctiveness, well-known status) | 150,000 – 250,000+ |
| Letter of Consent drafting & filing | 80,000 – 150,000 |
| Multi-ground response premium (per additional ground) | +30,000 / ground |
| Hourly rate (unpredictable matters) | 30,000 / hr |
| Trial Board appeal (post-Decision of Refusal) | 200,000 – 350,000 |
| Non-use cancellation against cited mark | 180,000 – 300,000 |
3. JPO Official Fees
JPO official fees are billed at cost, separate from professional fees:
- Provisional Refusal response: No JPO official fee
- Extension request: JPY 4,200 per extension
- Trial Board appeal: JPY 55,000 + 15,000 per class
- Non-use cancellation filing: JPY 56,000 + 15,000 per class
JPO official fees as of 2026; subject to revision by JPO. We confirm current rates at quote time.
4. What Drives Cost Variability
The most significant cost drivers are:
- Number of cited grounds. Multi-ground refusals require longer arguments.
- Number of cited prior marks. Each cited registration requires individual similarity analysis.
- Whether evidence is needed. Acquired distinctiveness and well-known status arguments require evidence collection, organization, and legal explanation.
- Letter of Consent negotiation. Cooperative counterparties resolve in days; uncooperative ones require extended exchange.
- Specification complexity. Wide specifications may require detailed restriction analysis.
5. Volume Discounts and Payment Terms
For foreign counsel with regular case flow:
- Volume discount: 10-20% off published fees for 5+ cases per quarter
- Quarterly consolidated invoicing: Available on request
- Payment terms: Standard Net 30. Wire transfer in JPY accepted.
- Currency: Invoices in JPY. Foreign-currency conversion at quoted rate (locked at engagement).
- Trust-account / IOLTA arrangements: Considered upon request
Frequently Asked Questions
Why do fee ranges vary so widely within a single category?
Are there hidden costs we should anticipate?
Do you charge for status updates or short consultations?
Related Articles
FOR FOREIGN COUNSEL
Need to respond to a JPO Provisional Refusal?
EVORIX provides specialized JPO Office Action response services for foreign counsel. Free assessment + fixed quote within 3-5 business days.
Related Articles
- Responding to a JPO Provisional Refusal: A Practical Guide for Foreign Counsel
- Top 5 Reasons for Trademark Refusals in Japan and How to Overcome Them
- Madrid Protocol in Japan: What to Expect After the Provisional Refusal
- Cost Estimate: Japan Trademark Office Action Response (2026 Update)
- Article 4(1)(11): Strategies to Argue Non-Similarity in Japan
- Japan Trademark Prosecution Timeline
- Letter of Consent in Japan: Practice After the 2024 Amendment
- Working with a Japanese Trademark Attorney: What Foreign Counsel Should Know