What Is the Paris Route (Direct Filing)? | A Patent Attorney’s Comprehensive Guide to Differences from the PCT, Paris Convention Priority, and Practices in Major Countries
There are two main methods for obtaining a patent overseas: the Paris Route (direct filing) and the PCT Route (international patent application). In this article, a patent attorney provides a comprehensive explanation of the Paris Route (direct filing) system based on the Paris Convention, including its differences from the PCT Route, the practical workflow, key considerations for major countries, estimated costs, and how to make strategic choices.
Table of Contents
- What Is the Paris Route (Direct Filing)?
- The Paris Convention and the Priority System
- Differences from the PCT Route (Detailed Comparison)
- Cases Where the Paris Route Is Chosen
- Practical Workflow for the Paris Route
- Key Points for Utilizing the 12-Month Priority Period
- Points to Note in Major Countries
- Cost Estimates for Paris Route Applications
- Advantages and Disadvantages
- Criteria for Choosing Between the PCT and the Paris Route
- Utilizing INPIT Grants
- Common Reasons for Rejection and How to Address Them
- Case Studies
- Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- Free Consultation & Inquiries
What is the Paris Route (Direct Filing)?
The Paris Route (Direct Filing) is a procedure that utilizes the priority system under the Paris Convention (Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property) to file a patent application directly in other member countries within 12 months of the filing date of the Japanese parent application. Since applications are filed individually with each country’s patent office, it is referred to as the “direct route,” in contrast to the PCT international application (via WIPO).
📌 Basic Structure of the Paris Route
- The Japanese parent application (the first application) serves as the starting point
- Individual applications are filed in each country within 12 months of the basic application (Article 4 priority under the Paris Convention)
- Prepare application forms and specifications in the local language for each country
- Appoint a local agent in each country to handle the proceedings
- Proceed according to each country’s unique examination process, official fees, and schedule
- Over 180 countries are members of the Paris Convention (applicable even to non-PCT member countries)
The Paris Route is essential when early protection is needed in a small number of countries (1–2) or for filing in non-PCT member countries (such as Taiwan). Because it directly addresses each country’s legal system and practices, it enables the drafting of claims optimized for the local market and strategic protection.
The Paris Convention and the Priority System
📜 Paris Convention (Concluded in 1883)
The Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, concluded in Paris, France, in 1883, is the world’s oldest international treaty related to patents. Japan acceded to the Convention in 1899. Currently, more than 180 countries are members, and it serves as the fundamental framework for the international protection of patents, utility models, designs, and trademarks.
⏱ Priority System (Article 4 of the Paris Convention)
Priority is a system that allows the filing date of the first application (the parent application) to be retroactively applied as the reference date for subsequent applications in other countries.
- Patents and Utility Models: Within 12 months of the basic application
- Designs and Trademarks: Within 6 months of the basic application
If an application is filed in another country within this period, it is deemed to have been filed on the same date as the basic application in that country, and the assessment of novelty and inventive step is based on the filing date of the basic application.
💡 The Importance of Priority: During the 12-month priority period, the novelty of your application in other countries is protected even if a third party files an application for the same invention or your company announces a new product. This system is essential for companies planning global expansion.
Differences from the PCT Route (Detailed Comparison)
| Item | Paris Route (Direct Filing) | PCT Route (International Application) |
|---|---|---|
| Filing Deadline | 12 months from the priority date (direct filing in each country) | 12 months from the priority date (PCT application) + 30 months (national phase) |
| Preparation of Application | Prepare separate applications in the language of each country | One copy in one language (Japanese or English) |
| Agent | Appoint a local agent in each country immediately | No local agent required until the domestic transition |
| Fees | Official fees for each country + attorney fees + translation fees (paid in full at the time of filing) | PCT basic fee + national fees upon national phase entry |
| International Search Report | None | Available (patentability can be predicted) |
| Time required (to obtain rights) | 6 months to 3 years depending on the country (early grant possible) | Examination begins after domestic filing (slightly delayed) |
| Flexibility of application strategy | Must be finalized within 12 months | 30 months for strategic planning |
| Target countries | Paris Convention member countries (over 180 countries, including Taiwan) | PCT Contracting States (157 countries; Taiwan excluded) |
| Claim adaptation | Can be optimized by country | Unified text (amended upon national phase entry) |
| Recommended Cases | 1–2 countries / Early grant of rights / Taiwan application / Countries already determined | 3 or more countries / Strategic planning time required / Marketability under review |
Cases where the Paris Route is chosen
🎯 1. The target countries have been finalized to 1–2
When business expansion is limited to specific regions and market feasibility has already been verified. The basic PCT fee (approx. 300,000 yen) is not required, making this a cost-effective option.
⚡ 2. Early grant of rights is required
When you wish to secure rights quickly due to the risk of competitors entering the market or infringement. Since there is no 30-month grace period under the PCT, examination begins promptly in each country.
🇹🇼 3. Filing in Taiwan
Since Taiwan is not a signatory to the PCT, the Paris Route (direct filing) is mandatory. Taiwan is a key market in the semiconductor and electronics sectors.
🎨 4. Optimizing claims by country
Claims can be drafted to align with national practices, such as functional claims in the U.S., the problem-solution approach in Europe, and disclosure requirements in China.
💼 5. Want to save on PCT base fees
Save on the basic fees for PCT international applications (WIPO fees + search fees + national fees = 300,000–400,000 yen). This is particularly effective for applications in a small number of countries.
📋 6. Want to disclose technical information early
Effective when you wish to disclose information early after filing in each country (e.g., U.S. provisional patent application) without waiting for the 18-month PCT publication.
Practical Workflow for the Paris Route
Japanese Parent Application
Filing a basic patent application with the Japan Patent Office. The priority date is established.
Selection of Target Countries (Decide Early)
Since a decision must be made within 12 months, the target countries must be finalized within 3 to 6 months of the priority date. The decision is based on the business plan, market size, and competitive landscape.
Translation of the specification and country-specific adjustments
Translate the Japanese specification into the languages of each target country. Optimize claims for each country, such as the U.S. (clarity requirements), Europe (multiple dependence restrictions), and China (disclosure requirements).
Appointment of Local Agents and Filing
Appointment of patent attorneys and patent lawyers in each country. Filing of applications with the respective national patent offices within 12 months of the priority date. Our firm utilizes a network of trusted agents in each country.
Submission of Priority Documents
Submit the Certificate of Priority issued by the Japan Patent Office to each country (for countries where DAS (Digital Access Service) is available, obtain it online).
Formality and Substantive Examinations in Each Country
Examination proceeds according to each country’s schedule. Early examination programs (such as PPH and Track One) may also be utilized. As a general guideline, the process takes approximately 1–2 years in the U.S., 1.5–2 years in China and South Korea, and 3–5 years in Europe.
Notification of Reasons for Rejection and Response
We collaborate with local agents in each country to file responses and amendments. Our firm handles strategy development and drafting in Japan, while local agents handle translation and filing.
Registration and Annuity Management
After registration in each country, we manage the payment of annuities (maintenance fees). Our firm’s annuity management system enables centralized management.
Key Points for Utilizing the 12-Month Priority Period
⚠️ The 12-month deadline is strict
The 12-month deadline applies worldwide and cannot be extended by even a single day. If the deadline is missed, you will lose the ability to claim priority, and there is a risk that novelty will not be recognized, resulting in the application being rejected. Our firm sends reminders 3 to 6 months before the deadline.
📅 Phased Filing Schedule
3–6 months from the priority date: Finalize target countries 6–9 months
: Translate specifications and appoint an agent 9–11 months
: Complete preparations for national filings Within
12 months: Complete national filings
💡 Partial Priority and Composite Priority
You can also utilize “multiple priority,” which combines multiple basic applications into a single foreign application. This can be optimized according to the phase of your research and development.
📋 Procedure for Claiming Priority
Include the application number and filing date of the basic application in the application form. In many countries, this information can be obtained online via DAS (WIPO Digital Access Service).
🎯 If Additional Inventions Arise Within 12 Months
If new inventions or improvements arise during the priority period, it is possible to file a foreign application that includes them (partial priority). For parts not included in the basic application, the foreign filing date serves as the basis for determining novelty.
Points to Note for Major Countries
🇺🇸 United States (USPTO)
- Paris Route: Request for Continued Examination (RCE) and Continuation Application (CON/CIP) are available
- Utilizing a Provisional Application → Obtaining an additional 12-month grace period
- Mandatory filing of an Information Disclosure Statement (IDS)
- Be aware of fees for exceeding the number of claims (additional fees apply for 21 or more claims)
- Strict requirements for clarity of technical terms (35 U.S.C. §112)
- Examination can be completed within 12 months via Track One Prioritized Examination
🇪🇺 Europe (EPO)
- European Patent Applications can be filed directly via the Paris Route
- A single application can designate 38 member states (validation required in each country after registration)
- Restrictions on multiple dependencies
- Examination based on the Problem-Solution Approach
- The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court (UPC) will become operational in June 2023
- Opposition period is 9 months from registration
🇨🇳 China (CNIPA)
- Separate applications required for Hong Kong and Macau (independent from mainland China)
- Chinese translation is mandatory (to be submitted at the time of filing)
- Strict disclosure requirements (Article 26 of the Chinese Patent Law) → Frequent rejections based on lack of support
- 2024 Amendments to the Implementing Rules of the Patent Law: Streamlined examination and expanded PPH
- Strengthened measures against malicious trademark applications
- Utility models may also be used in conjunction (earlier grant of rights than patents)
🇰🇷 South Korea (KIPO)
- Korean translation is mandatory
- Fast examination speed (1.5–2 years)
- 2024 Amendment: Partial introduction of the Letter of Consent system
- Many rejections under Article 32 of the Patent Act (prior similar trademarks) (trademarks)
- Early examination based on a Japanese patent is available via PPH (Patent Prosecution Highway)
🇹🇼 Taiwan (TIPO)
- Non-PCT member country → Paris Route required
- De facto mutual recognition under the Paris Convention since the 1990s
- Traditional Chinese translation is mandatory
- Key market in the semiconductor and electronics sectors
- Examination period: 1.5–2.5 years
- Early examination available via PPH (Japan-Taiwan)
🇮🇳 India (IPO)
- Based on English specification (reduced translation costs)
- Article 3(k): Computer programs as such are not patentable
- Section 3(d): New salts and polymorphs of pharmaceuticals are subject to limited protection
- Obtaining a Foreign Filing License (for inventors residing in India)
- Examination period: 3–5 years (somewhat long)
Cost Estimate for Paris Route Applications
While there are no upfront fees like those for PCT applications, the full application fee for each country must be paid immediately.
| Country/Region | Filing Fees (Paris Route) | Main Breakdown |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 United States | USD 3,500–5,500 | USPTO fees + U.S. attorney fees + translation fees (based on Japanese specification) |
| 🇪🇺 Europe (EPO) | EUR 3,000–5,000 | EPO Office fees + Translation fees + European attorney |
| 🇨🇳 China | 250,000–350,000 yen | CNIPA fees + Chinese translation + Chinese agent |
| 🇰🇷 South Korea | 250,000–300,000 yen | KIPO fees + Korean translation + Korean agent |
| 🇹🇼 Taiwan | 200,000–300,000 yen | TIPO fees + Traditional Chinese translation + Taiwanese agent |
| 🇮🇳 India | USD 2,500–4,000 | Based on English specification, Indian agent fees |
| 🇸🇬 Singapore | USD 3,000–4,500 | Based on English specification, suitable for ASEAN locations |
| 🇧🇷 Brazil | USD 4,500–6,500 | Portuguese translation + Brazilian agent |
| Our firm’s agency fees | 150,000–300,000 yen per country | Application strategy development, drafting, and coordination with local agents |
📌 Cost Comparison with PCT: The PCT route requires a basic PCT fee (approx. 300,000–400,000 yen) at the time of filing, but the costs for national phase entry are roughly the same as the Paris route. Generally, the PCT is more advantageous for three or more countries, while the Paris route is more advantageous for one or two countries.
Advantages and Disadvantages
✅ Advantages
- Total costs are lower for applications in a small number of countries (1–2)
- Examination and grant of rights begin early
- Claims can be optimized for each country
- Applications can be filed in non-PCT member countries (e.g., Taiwan)
- Savings on PCT basic fees
- Immediate access to country-specific accelerated examination programs (such as PPH)
❌ Disadvantages
- Must finalize the countries of filing within 12 months
- Must pay the full application fee for each country immediately
- In the case of multiple-country applications, cannot be processed as a single procedure, making management cumbersome
- Cannot utilize the International Search Report (ISR)
- Simultaneous response to rejections in each country is required
- The strategic timeframe is shorter than under the PCT
Criteria for choosing between the PCT and Paris routes
🎯 Route Selection Flowchart
- Check the number of countries of filing → Consider PCT if 3 or more
- Does it include Taiwan? → If so, the Paris Route is mandatory for Taiwan
- Has market feasibility been verified? → If not, use the PCT (utilize the 30-month grace period)
- Is early grant of rights necessary? → If so, use the Paris Route
- Is the budget sufficient? → If limited, use the PCT (to spread costs during transition)
- 1–2 countries in addition to key markets where business plans are finalized (e.g., U.S., China) → Paris Route is advantageous
💡 Hybrid Strategy: It is also possible to combine the Paris Route for the main country (e.g., the U.S.) with the PCT for secondary countries (multiple). Our firm will propose the optimal route design based on your business plan, budget, and deadlines.
Utilizing INPIT Grants
💰 Paris Route applications are also eligible for INPIT grants
The INPIT Foreign Application Subsidy also covers the Paris Route (direct filing). Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and startups can cover up to half of their application costs (annual cap of 3 million yen, 1.5 million yen per patent application) through this subsidy.
- Our application handling fee: Flat rate of 50,000 yen (excluding tax)
- 100% Approval Rate in Previous Round
- Eligible for both the Paris Route and PCT
- Covers all types of intellectual property: patents, utility models, designs, and trademarks
Common grounds for rejection and how to address them
1. Lack of Novelty or Inventive Step
The most common grounds for rejection. Address by amending claims or submitting a written argument based on prior art search results. Argumentation must align with each country’s criteria for assessing inventive step (e.g., non-obviousness in the U.S., Problem-Solution in Europe, and obviousness in Japan).
2. Insufficient Disclosure or Violation of the Requirement of Support
Requirements for claim clarity and enablement are particularly strict in the U.S. (35 U.S.C. §112), China (Patent Law Article 26(3)), and Europe (EPC Article 84). If support from the specification is insufficient, address the issue through amendments.
3. Lack of Unity
Rejection occurs when multiple inventions are included. This can be addressed through a divisional application.
4. Lack of Patent Eligibility
Rejections based on abstract ideas, standalone computer programs, business methods, etc., in the U.S. (35 U.S.C. §101 / Alice decision), India (Section 3), and Europe (EPC Article 52). Address this by amending the claims to emphasize technical features.
Case Studies
📊 Case 1: Semiconductor Startup (U.S. and Taiwan)
- Business: Technology venture in the semiconductor memory sector
- Strategy: Focus on two countries—the U.S. (primary market) and Taiwan (manufacturing base)
- Approach: Paris Route (direct filing in both countries)
- Reason: Taiwan does not accept PCT applications; in the U.S., Track One accelerated examination allows for registration within 18 months
- Result: Early registration contributed to increased corporate valuation during the IPO round
📊 Case 2: Healthcare IT Company (U.S. Only)
- Business: Medical diagnostic AI application
- Strategy: Focus exclusively on the U.S.
- Choice: Paris Route (U.S. provisional application → regular application)
- Reason: Since the target is only one country, the PCT base fee would be wasted; the provisional application secures an additional 12-month grace period
- Result: 60% reduction in filing costs; established exclusive rights in the U.S. market
📊 Case 3: Machinery Manufacturer (Multiple Countries → PCT Selected)
- Business: Industrial machinery manufacturer
- Strategy: Plans to expand into four countries: the U.S., Europe, China, and South Korea
- Choice: PCT route (4 countries is 3 or more → PCT is advantageous)
- Reason: Utilized the 30-month strategic window to assess market viability and proceed with all four countries
- Result: Built an efficient global portfolio by spreading costs and utilizing the strategic timeframe
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Which route is more advantageous, the Paris Route or the PCT Route?
Q What happens if the Paris Convention priority period (12 months) expires?
Q What if I want to file an application in a country that is not a member of the Paris Convention?
Q Can I use the PCT International Search Report (ISR) even when filing via the Paris Route?
Q Can the Paris Route and the PCT be used together?
Q Should I use a U.S. Provisional Application?
Q Are Paris Convention applications eligible for the INPIT Foreign Application Subsidy?
Q How do I obtain a Certificate of Priority?
Q Who translates the specification?
Q Is a free consultation available?
Free Consultation & Inquiries
Free Consultation on Overseas Patent Application Strategy
At our firm, patent attorneys well-versed in both the Paris Route (direct filing) and PCT international applications will propose the optimal route based on your business plan and budget. For small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and startups, we also offer assistance with applying for the INPIT Foreign Application Subsidy (100% approval rate).
Business Hours: Weekdays 9:00 AM – 8:00 PM
Related Services & Articles
Please also see our services and articles related to overseas patents