Not every Japanese Office Action is about prior art. A large share of objections on national phase...
Missed the 30-Month Deadline for Japan? PCT National Phase Restoration Under the “Unintentional” Standard (Since April 2023)
A missed 30-month deadline used to be close to fatal in Japan: the old “due care” standard was rarely satisfied. That changed on April 1, 2023. Under the current “unintentional” standard (Art. 184-4(4) of the Patent Act), a PCT applicant who failed to file the Japanese translation in time can still enter Japan if the failure was not deliberate — within a strict window and against a substantial fee. This guide explains what “deemed withdrawn” means, the exact restoration procedure and its deadlines, and the second trap that follows a late entry: the patent administrator rule.
Table of Contents
- What “deemed withdrawn” means — and the 2-month translation special period
- The 2023 change: from “due care” to “unintentional”
- Restoration step by step: window, documents, fee
- What counts as “intentional”
- The second trap: the patent administrator deadline
- Checklist for the day you discover a missed Japan deadline
- FAQ
1. What “Deemed Withdrawn” Means — and the 2-Month Translation Special Period
For a PCT application filed in a language other than Japanese, national phase entry into Japan requires the Japanese translation of the description, claims and drawings text within the national document filing period — 30 months from the earliest priority date (Art. 184-4(1)). One relief is built into the statute: if the national form (国内書面) was filed within the last 2 months before the 30-month date, the translation may be filed within 2 months of that filing (the “translation special period”). If the translation is not filed within the applicable period, the international application is deemed withdrawn as to Japan (Art. 184-4(3)).
2. The 2023 Change: From “Due Care” to “Unintentional”
Before April 2023, restoration required proof that the failure occurred despite “due care” — a standard the JPO interpreted narrowly. The amended Art. 184-4(4) now permits late filing of the translation unless the failure is found to have been intentional. The practical effect: a docketing error, a lost instruction, an internal miscommunication or a misunderstanding between foreign counsel and the applicant is, as a rule, not intentional and therefore restorable. The same standard applies to the examination request deadline and to the patent administrator notification (Section 5).
3. Restoration Step by Step: Window, Documents, Fee
| Element | Requirement (JPO guidance, updated May 18, 2026) |
|---|---|
| Window | Within 2 months from the date the applicant became able to file (in practice, the date the missed deadline was discovered) and no later than 1 year after the expiry of the original period |
| What to file | The Japanese translation (with the national form and fees) together with a statement of reasons for restoration (回復理由書): the cause of the failure, the date you became able to act, and a statement that the failure was not intentional |
| Evidence | Not required as a rule. Required only if you request waiver of the fee on the ground that the failure was due to reasons not attributable to the applicant |
| Fee | Restoration fee JPY 212,100 (patents), in addition to the ordinary entry fees |
| Who files | Through a representative in Japan in practice — and note that a patent administrator must in any event be appointed after entry (Section 5) |
Why the 2-month window is the number that matters
The 1-year outer limit is generous; the 2-month window from discovery is not. The JPO counts from the date you became able to act, which is normally the date the missed deadline came to your attention. Instruct Japanese counsel the same day, with the PCT publication, the priority documents and a short factual account of how the deadline was missed.
4. What Counts as “Intentional”
The standard is not “was the applicant careful” but “did the applicant knowingly decide not to file”. The JPO’s guidance gives examples of situations that are not relieved — typically a deliberate decision not to enter Japan that the applicant later reverses because of a change in business policy. By contrast, cases where the applicant intended to enter Japan but the filing did not happen because of an error in the chain of instructions are the core of what the amended provision is meant to rescue. The statement of reasons should therefore describe the facts plainly: who was responsible for the filing, what went wrong, and when it was discovered.
5. The Second Trap: the Patent Administrator Deadline
Restoring the entry is only half the job. An applicant residing outside Japan may act without a Japanese representative only until the national processing standard time; after that a patent administrator (特許管理人) domiciled in Japan must be appointed and notified to the JPO within 3 months (Art. 184-11; Regulation Art. 38-6-2). If the notification is missing, the JPO issues a notice and gives 2 further months; failing that, the application is deemed withdrawn — again restorable only under the unintentional standard, within 2 months of becoming able to act and within 1 year, with the same JPY 212,100 fee. Full details in our national phase entry guide.
The pattern that kills self-entered cases
An applicant files the national form and translation from abroad, no patent administrator is appointed, and the JPO’s notice is mailed to a foreign address where nobody connects it to the case. Two months later the application is deemed withdrawn. If you entered Japan without Japanese counsel, appoint a patent administrator now — and if an Office Action is already pending, it can only be answered through one (see our Office Action guide).
6. Checklist for the Day You Discover a Missed Japan Deadline
- Record today’s date — the 2-month window runs from it
- Confirm which period was missed: the 30-month period, the translation special period, the examination request, or the patent administrator notification
- Collect the facts of the failure (who, what, when) for the statement of reasons
- Instruct Japanese counsel to file the translation, the statement of reasons and the restoration fee — and to appoint a patent administrator
- Check for any pending Office Action or examination request deadline on the restored case
Frequently Asked Questions
What exactly happens when the 30-month deadline is missed?
How long do I have to request restoration?
Do I need to prove why the deadline was missed?
What is the fee?
Is a deliberate decision not to enter Japan, later reversed, restorable?
FOR FOREIGN COUNSEL & APPLICANTS
Facing a JPO deadline on a Japanese case?
Send us the Office Action or the case details — EVORIX handles national phase entry, patent administrator appointment and Office Action responses for overseas applicants. Free assessment and a fixed quote within 3-5 business days.
Related Articles
- Inventive Step Rejections in Japan (Article 29(2)): How the JPO Examiner Builds the Argument — and How to Take It Apart
- New Matter and “Final” Office Actions in Japan: Amendment Limits Under Article 17-2 — What You Can Still Change
- Support, Clarity and Enablement Rejections in Japan (Article 36): Fixing Description-Requirement Objections in a National Phase Case
- “Not an Invention” Rejections in Japan (Article 29(1) Main Paragraph): Software, Business Methods and the Hardware-Resource Test
- Received a Decision of Refusal from the JPO? Your Three Options — Appeal (3 Months + 60 Days for Overseas Applicants), Pre-Appeal Reexamination, Divisional
- JPO Office Action for Overseas Applicants: Deadline, Extensions, Options & Cost
- PCT National Phase Entry Japan: Deadline, Restoration, Patent Administrator, Costs
- Multi-Multi Claims in Japan: Which Applications Are Affected
- Costs for National Phase Entry in Japan
Disclaimer
This article provides general information about Japanese patent practice as of September 2026 and does not constitute legal advice. Periods, fees and examination practice may change, and the deadline for a specific case depends on the documents actually issued. Please consult a qualified Japanese patent attorney about your specific matter.
Sources
- Japan Patent Act (Japanese text) — laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/334AC0000000121
- Regulations under the Patent Act, Art. 38-6-2 — laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/335M50000400010
- JPO: extension of response periods (practice from April 1, 2016) — www.jpo.go.jp/system/patent/shinsa/letter/kyozetu_entyou_160401.html
- JPO: relief after expiry of periods under the “unintentional” standard (updated May 18, 2026) — www.jpo.go.jp/system/laws/rule/guideline/kyusai_method2.html
- JPO Formality Examination Manual 04.10 (PDF) — www.jpo.go.jp/system/laws/rule/guideline/hoshiki-shinsa-binran/kaitei/document/index/h2904_04_10.pdf
- JPO Examination Guidelines, Part III Ch. 2 Sec. 2 “Inventive Step” (PDF) — www.jpo.go.jp/system/laws/rule/guideline/patent/tukujitu_kijun/document/index/03_0202bm.pdf
- JPO Examination Guidelines, Part IV Ch. 2 “Amendment Adding New Matter” (PDF) — www.jpo.go.jp/system/laws/rule/guideline/patent/tukujitu_kijun/document/index/04_0200bm.pdf
- JPO Examination Guidelines, Part III Ch. 1 “Eligibility for Patent” (PDF) — www.jpo.go.jp/system/laws/rule/guideline/patent/tukujitu_kijun/document/index/03_0100bm.pdf
- JPO Examination Handbook, Annex B Ch. 1 “Computer Software-Related Inventions” (PDF) — www.jpo.go.jp/system/laws/rule/guideline/patent/handbook_shinsa/document/index/app_b1.pdf